CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
WMU logo
Home team (Team B)
RICE logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
WMU logoWestern Michigan
1-1 ยท 58.8 PWR
73%

WMU win probability

Projected line: WMU -4.2

RICE logoRice
1-1 ยท 52.0 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

35QB vs QB40

-2.1 RICE advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Western Michigan (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). RICE Below average.

36WR Room vs WR Room37

-0.4 RICE advantage โ€” 1-point index gap over Western Michigan (explosive pass rate and yards per target). RICE Below average.

39RB Room vs RB Room49

-4.2 RICE advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over Western Michigan (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). RICE FBS average.

41Run Blocking vs Run Defense42

-0.4 RICE advantage โ€” 1-point index gap over Western Michigan (line yards against stuff rate). RICE FBS average.

38Offensive Line vs Pass Rush49

-4.6 RICE advantage โ€” 11-point index gap over Western Michigan (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). RICE FBS average.

35Pass Game vs Coverage51

-6.7 RICE advantage โ€” 16-point index gap over Western Michigan (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). RICE FBS average.

41Pass Rush vs Offensive Line48

-2.9 RICE advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Western Michigan (pressure differential in the trenches). RICE FBS average.

42Coverage vs Pass Game37

+2.1 WMU advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Rice (coverage grade against target efficiency). WMU FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.