CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
WMU logo
Home team (Team B)
MICH logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Western Michigan is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

WMU logoWestern Michigan
1-1 ยท 58.8 PWR
96%

MICH win probability

Projected line: MICH -14.7

MICH logoMichigan
2-0 ยท 82.5 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

35QB vs QB64

-12.2 MICH advantage โ€” 29-point index gap over Western Michigan (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). MICH Above average.

36WR Room vs WR Room63

-11.3 MICH advantage โ€” 27-point index gap over Western Michigan (explosive pass rate and yards per target). MICH Above average.

39RB Room vs RB Room65

-10.9 MICH advantage โ€” 26-point index gap over Western Michigan (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). MICH Above average.

41Run Blocking vs Run Defense65

-10.1 MICH advantage โ€” 24-point index gap over Western Michigan (line yards against stuff rate). MICH Above average.

38Offensive Line vs Pass Rush67

-12.2 MICH advantage โ€” 29-point index gap over Western Michigan (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). MICH Above average.

35Pass Game vs Coverage70

-14.7 MICH advantage โ€” 35-point index gap over Western Michigan (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). MICH Above average.

41Pass Rush vs Offensive Line66

-10.5 MICH advantage โ€” 25-point index gap over Western Michigan (pressure differential in the trenches). MICH Above average.

42Coverage vs Pass Game63

-8.8 MICH advantage โ€” 21-point index gap over Western Michigan (coverage grade against target efficiency). MICH Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.