CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
WKU logo
Home team (Team B)
IU logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Western Kentucky is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

WKU logoWestern Kentucky
0-2 ยท 45.3 PWR
96%

IU win probability

Projected line: IU -23.2

IU logoIndiana
2-0 ยท 82.7 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

41QB vs QB69

-11.8 IU advantage โ€” 28-point index gap over Western Kentucky (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). IU Above average.

39WR Room vs WR Room69

-12.6 IU advantage โ€” 30-point index gap over Western Kentucky (explosive pass rate and yards per target). IU Above average.

40RB Room vs RB Room50

-4.2 IU advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over Western Kentucky (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). IU FBS average.

41Run Blocking vs Run Defense49

-3.4 IU advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over Western Kentucky (line yards against stuff rate). IU FBS average.

42Offensive Line vs Pass Rush49

-2.9 IU advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Western Kentucky (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). IU FBS average.

39Pass Game vs Coverage50

-4.6 IU advantage โ€” 11-point index gap over Western Kentucky (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). IU FBS average.

38Pass Rush vs Offensive Line59

-8.8 IU advantage โ€” 21-point index gap over Western Kentucky (pressure differential in the trenches). IU Above average.

39Coverage vs Pass Game70

-13.0 IU advantage โ€” 31-point index gap over Western Kentucky (coverage grade against target efficiency). IU Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.