CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
WAKE logo
Home team (Team B)
PUR logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Wake Forest is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

WAKE logoWake Forest
2-0 ยท 72.5 PWR
53%

WAKE win probability

Projected line: WAKE -0.5

PUR logoPurdue
1-1 ยท 71.7 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

54QB vs QB59

-2.1 PUR advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Wake Forest (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). PUR Above average.

57WR Room vs WR Room59

-0.8 PUR advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Wake Forest (explosive pass rate and yards per target). PUR Above average.

54RB Room vs RB Room53

+0.4 WAKE advantage โ€” 1-point index gap over Purdue (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). WAKE FBS average.

53Run Blocking vs Run Defense56

-1.3 PUR advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Wake Forest (line yards against stuff rate). PUR FBS average.

55Offensive Line vs Pass Rush60

-2.1 PUR advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Wake Forest (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). PUR Above average.

57Pass Game vs Coverage55

+0.8 WAKE advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Purdue (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). WAKE FBS average.

49Pass Rush vs Offensive Line56

-2.9 PUR advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Wake Forest (pressure differential in the trenches). PUR FBS average.

52Coverage vs Pass Game59

-2.9 PUR advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Wake Forest (coverage grade against target efficiency). PUR Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.