CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
COLO logo
Home team (Team B)
VT logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
COLO logoColorado
2-0 ยท 75.6 PWR
54%

VT win probability

Projected line: VT -0.7

VT logoVirginia Tech
2-0 ยท 76.8 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

50QB vs QB63

-5.5 VT advantage โ€” 13-point index gap over Colorado (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). VT Above average.

50WR Room vs WR Room58

-3.4 VT advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over Colorado (explosive pass rate and yards per target). VT Above average.

53RB Room vs RB Room68

-6.3 VT advantage โ€” 15-point index gap over Colorado (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). VT Above average.

54Run Blocking vs Run Defense69

-6.3 VT advantage โ€” 15-point index gap over Colorado (line yards against stuff rate). VT Above average.

55Offensive Line vs Pass Rush76

-8.8 VT advantage โ€” 21-point index gap over Colorado (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). VT Top 25 level.

50Pass Game vs Coverage62

-5.0 VT advantage โ€” 12-point index gap over Colorado (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). VT Above average.

58Pass Rush vs Offensive Line61

-1.3 VT advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Colorado (pressure differential in the trenches). VT Above average.

52Coverage vs Pass Game59

-2.9 VT advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Colorado (coverage grade against target efficiency). VT Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.