CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
VT logo
Home team (Team B)
MD logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Virginia Tech is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

VT logoVirginia Tech
2-0 ยท 76.8 PWR
55%

VT win probability

Projected line: VT -0.9

MD logoMaryland
2-0 ยท 75.3 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

63QB vs QB53

+4.2 VT advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over Maryland (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). VT Above average.

58WR Room vs WR Room54

+1.7 VT advantage โ€” 4-point index gap over Maryland (explosive pass rate and yards per target). VT Above average.

68RB Room vs RB Room62

+2.5 VT advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Maryland (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). VT Above average.

65Run Blocking vs Run Defense67

-0.8 MD advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Virginia Tech (line yards against stuff rate). MD Above average.

61Offensive Line vs Pass Rush65

-1.7 MD advantage โ€” 4-point index gap over Virginia Tech (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). MD Above average.

59Pass Game vs Coverage59

Even matchup โ€” both units index the same

76Pass Rush vs Offensive Line58

+7.6 VT advantage โ€” 18-point index gap over Maryland (pressure differential in the trenches). VT Top 25 level.

62Coverage vs Pass Game53

+3.8 VT advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Maryland (coverage grade against target efficiency). VT Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.