CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
USU logo
Home team (Team B)
WASH logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Utah State is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

USU logoUtah State
0-2 ยท 55.2 PWR
96%

WASH win probability

Projected line: WASH -15.0

WASH logoWashington
2-0 ยท 79.4 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

38QB vs QB55

-7.1 WASH advantage โ€” 17-point index gap over Utah State (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). WASH FBS average.

38WR Room vs WR Room54

-6.7 WASH advantage โ€” 16-point index gap over Utah State (explosive pass rate and yards per target). WASH FBS average.

40RB Room vs RB Room54

-5.9 WASH advantage โ€” 14-point index gap over Utah State (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). WASH FBS average.

43Run Blocking vs Run Defense58

-6.3 WASH advantage โ€” 15-point index gap over Utah State (line yards against stuff rate). WASH Above average.

41Offensive Line vs Pass Rush62

-8.8 WASH advantage โ€” 21-point index gap over Utah State (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). WASH Above average.

38Pass Game vs Coverage61

-9.7 WASH advantage โ€” 23-point index gap over Utah State (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). WASH Above average.

39Pass Rush vs Offensive Line58

-8.0 WASH advantage โ€” 19-point index gap over Utah State (pressure differential in the trenches). WASH Above average.

43Coverage vs Pass Game54

-4.6 WASH advantage โ€” 11-point index gap over Utah State (coverage grade against target efficiency). WASH FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.