CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

College Football Matchup Simulator

Team Selection

Away team (Team A)
USC official team mark
Home team (Team B)
IU official team mark

Color clash detected — USC is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

USC official team markUSC
8-2 · 79.6 PWR
64%

IU win probability

Projected line: IU -2.6

Indiana official team markIndiana
8-1 · 83.8 PWR

Positional Comparison — 0 to 100 unit index

50 = FBS average · 72+ = Top 25 level · 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

73QB vs QB69

+1.7 USC advantage — 4-point index gap over Indiana (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). USC Top 25 level.

69WR Room vs WR Room69

Even matchup — both units index the same

62RB Room vs RB Room50

+5.0 USC advantage — 12-point index gap over Indiana (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). USC Above average.

65Run Blocking vs Run Defense49

+6.7 USC advantage — 16-point index gap over Indiana (line yards against stuff rate). USC Above average.

68Offensive Line vs Pass Rush49

+8.0 USC advantage — 19-point index gap over Indiana (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). USC Above average.

70Pass Game vs Coverage50

+8.4 USC advantage — 20-point index gap over Indiana (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). USC Above average.

65Pass Rush vs Offensive Line59

+2.5 USC advantage — 6-point index gap over Indiana (pressure differential in the trenches). USC Above average.

62Coverage vs Pass Game70

-3.4 IU advantage — 8-point index gap over USC (coverage grade against target efficiency). IU Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.