CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
UNLV logo
Home team (Team B)
UNT logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
UNLV logoUNLV
1-2 ยท 57.9 PWR
57%

UNLV win probability

Projected line: UNLV -1.2

UNT logoNorth Texas
1-1 ยท 55.9 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

46QB vs QB44

+0.8 UNLV advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over North Texas (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). UNLV FBS average.

49WR Room vs WR Room48

+0.4 UNLV advantage โ€” 1-point index gap over North Texas (explosive pass rate and yards per target). UNLV FBS average.

53RB Room vs RB Room44

+3.8 UNLV advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over North Texas (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). UNLV FBS average.

53Run Blocking vs Run Defense45

+3.4 UNLV advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over North Texas (line yards against stuff rate). UNLV FBS average.

46Offensive Line vs Pass Rush34

+5.0 UNLV advantage โ€” 12-point index gap over North Texas (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). UNLV FBS average.

48Pass Game vs Coverage26

+9.2 UNLV advantage โ€” 22-point index gap over North Texas (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). UNLV FBS average.

52Pass Rush vs Offensive Line47

+2.1 UNLV advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over North Texas (pressure differential in the trenches). UNLV FBS average.

53Coverage vs Pass Game47

+2.5 UNLV advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over North Texas (coverage grade against target efficiency). UNLV FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.