CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
ULM logo
Home team (Team B)
MSST logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” UL Monroe is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

ULM logoUL Monroe
0-2 ยท 42.0 PWR
96%

MSST win probability

Projected line: MSST -24.1

MSST logoMississippi State
2-0 ยท 80.8 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

29QB vs QB63

-14.3 MSST advantage โ€” 34-point index gap over UL Monroe (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). MSST Above average.

28WR Room vs WR Room61

-13.9 MSST advantage โ€” 33-point index gap over UL Monroe (explosive pass rate and yards per target). MSST Above average.

33RB Room vs RB Room71

-16.0 MSST advantage โ€” 38-point index gap over UL Monroe (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). MSST Above average.

36Run Blocking vs Run Defense57

-8.8 MSST advantage โ€” 21-point index gap over UL Monroe (line yards against stuff rate). MSST FBS average.

34Offensive Line vs Pass Rush58

-10.1 MSST advantage โ€” 24-point index gap over UL Monroe (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). MSST Above average.

29Pass Game vs Coverage62

-13.9 MSST advantage โ€” 33-point index gap over UL Monroe (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). MSST Above average.

31Pass Rush vs Offensive Line65

-14.3 MSST advantage โ€” 34-point index gap over UL Monroe (pressure differential in the trenches). MSST Above average.

31Coverage vs Pass Game62

-13.0 MSST advantage โ€” 31-point index gap over UL Monroe (coverage grade against target efficiency). MSST Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.