CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
CONN logo
Home team (Team B)
USM logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
CONN logoUConn
1-1 ยท 61.2 PWR
68%

CONN win probability

Projected line: CONN -3.2

USM logoSouthern Miss
1-1 ยท 56.0 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

51QB vs QB49

+0.8 CONN advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Southern Miss (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). CONN FBS average.

52WR Room vs WR Room46

+2.5 CONN advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Southern Miss (explosive pass rate and yards per target). CONN FBS average.

53RB Room vs RB Room53

Even matchup โ€” both units index the same

50Run Blocking vs Run Defense54

-1.7 USM advantage โ€” 4-point index gap over UConn (line yards against stuff rate). USM FBS average.

52Offensive Line vs Pass Rush44

+3.4 CONN advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over Southern Miss (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). CONN FBS average.

52Pass Game vs Coverage45

+2.9 CONN advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Southern Miss (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). CONN FBS average.

46Pass Rush vs Offensive Line52

-2.5 USM advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over UConn (pressure differential in the trenches). USM FBS average.

53Coverage vs Pass Game46

+2.9 CONN advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Southern Miss (coverage grade against target efficiency). CONN FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.