CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
UCF logo
Home team (Team B)
PITT logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
UCF logoUCF
1-1 ยท 72.3 PWR
55%

PITT win probability

Projected line: PITT -0.9

PITT logoPittsburgh
2-0 ยท 73.7 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

51QB vs QB56

-2.1 PITT advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over UCF (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). PITT FBS average.

50WR Room vs WR Room58

-3.4 PITT advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over UCF (explosive pass rate and yards per target). PITT Above average.

66RB Room vs RB Room55

+4.6 UCF advantage โ€” 11-point index gap over Pittsburgh (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). UCF Above average.

63Run Blocking vs Run Defense55

+3.4 UCF advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over Pittsburgh (line yards against stuff rate). UCF Above average.

55Offensive Line vs Pass Rush49

+2.5 UCF advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Pittsburgh (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). UCF FBS average.

50Pass Game vs Coverage50

Even matchup โ€” both units index the same

59Pass Rush vs Offensive Line56

+1.3 UCF advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Pittsburgh (pressure differential in the trenches). UCF Above average.

60Coverage vs Pass Game58

+0.8 UCF advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Pittsburgh (coverage grade against target efficiency). UCF Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.