CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
UAB logo
Home team (Team B)
UL logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
UAB logoUAB
1-1 ยท 56.5 PWR
65%

UL win probability

Projected line: UL -2.7

UL logoLouisiana
1-1 ยท 60.9 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

40QB vs QB45

-2.1 UL advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over UAB (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). UL FBS average.

41WR Room vs WR Room45

-1.7 UL advantage โ€” 4-point index gap over UAB (explosive pass rate and yards per target). UL FBS average.

46RB Room vs RB Room51

-2.1 UL advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over UAB (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). UL FBS average.

49Run Blocking vs Run Defense48

+0.4 UAB advantage โ€” 1-point index gap over Louisiana (line yards against stuff rate). UAB FBS average.

46Offensive Line vs Pass Rush48

-0.8 UL advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over UAB (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). UL FBS average.

41Pass Game vs Coverage48

-2.9 UL advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over UAB (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). UL FBS average.

36Pass Rush vs Offensive Line47

-4.6 UL advantage โ€” 11-point index gap over UAB (pressure differential in the trenches). UL FBS average.

35Coverage vs Pass Game45

-4.2 UL advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over UAB (coverage grade against target efficiency). UL FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.