CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
UAB logo
Home team (Team B)
ILL logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
UAB logoUAB
1-1 ยท 56.5 PWR
94%

ILL win probability

Projected line: ILL -7.9

ILL logoIllinois
1-1 ยท 69.3 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

40QB vs QB59

-8.0 ILL advantage โ€” 19-point index gap over UAB (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). ILL Above average.

41WR Room vs WR Room58

-7.1 ILL advantage โ€” 17-point index gap over UAB (explosive pass rate and yards per target). ILL Above average.

46RB Room vs RB Room53

-2.9 ILL advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over UAB (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). ILL FBS average.

49Run Blocking vs Run Defense45

+1.7 UAB advantage โ€” 4-point index gap over Illinois (line yards against stuff rate). UAB FBS average.

46Offensive Line vs Pass Rush49

-1.3 ILL advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over UAB (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). ILL FBS average.

41Pass Game vs Coverage53

-5.0 ILL advantage โ€” 12-point index gap over UAB (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). ILL FBS average.

36Pass Rush vs Offensive Line56

-8.4 ILL advantage โ€” 20-point index gap over UAB (pressure differential in the trenches). ILL FBS average.

35Coverage vs Pass Game59

-10.1 ILL advantage โ€” 24-point index gap over UAB (coverage grade against target efficiency). ILL Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.