CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
TULN logo
Home team (Team B)
DUKE logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Tulane is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

TULN logoTulane
1-1 ยท 63.7 PWR
72%

DUKE win probability

Projected line: DUKE -4.0

DUKE logoDuke
2-0 ยท 70.2 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

45QB vs QB41

+1.7 TULN advantage โ€” 4-point index gap over Duke (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). TULN FBS average.

44WR Room vs WR Room44

Even matchup โ€” both units index the same

43RB Room vs RB Room50

-2.9 DUKE advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Tulane (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). DUKE FBS average.

48Run Blocking vs Run Defense51

-1.3 DUKE advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Tulane (line yards against stuff rate). DUKE FBS average.

46Offensive Line vs Pass Rush54

-3.4 DUKE advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over Tulane (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). DUKE FBS average.

45Pass Game vs Coverage53

-3.4 DUKE advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over Tulane (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). DUKE FBS average.

46Pass Rush vs Offensive Line51

-2.1 DUKE advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Tulane (pressure differential in the trenches). DUKE FBS average.

53Coverage vs Pass Game43

+4.2 TULN advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over Duke (coverage grade against target efficiency). TULN FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.