CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
TROY logo
Home team (Team B)
MIZ logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
TROY logoTroy
2-0 ยท 58.2 PWR
96%

MIZ win probability

Projected line: MIZ -13.5

MIZ logoMissouri
2-0 ยท 79.9 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

41QB vs QB69

-11.8 MIZ advantage โ€” 28-point index gap over Troy (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). MIZ Above average.

46WR Room vs WR Room66

-8.4 MIZ advantage โ€” 20-point index gap over Troy (explosive pass rate and yards per target). MIZ Above average.

42RB Room vs RB Room59

-7.1 MIZ advantage โ€” 17-point index gap over Troy (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). MIZ Above average.

40Run Blocking vs Run Defense61

-8.8 MIZ advantage โ€” 21-point index gap over Troy (line yards against stuff rate). MIZ Above average.

37Offensive Line vs Pass Rush60

-9.7 MIZ advantage โ€” 23-point index gap over Troy (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). MIZ Above average.

45Pass Game vs Coverage67

-9.2 MIZ advantage โ€” 22-point index gap over Troy (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). MIZ Above average.

46Pass Rush vs Offensive Line64

-7.6 MIZ advantage โ€” 18-point index gap over Troy (pressure differential in the trenches). MIZ Above average.

44Coverage vs Pass Game67

-9.7 MIZ advantage โ€” 23-point index gap over Troy (coverage grade against target efficiency). MIZ Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.