CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
TOL logo
Home team (Team B)
MSU logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Toledo is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

TOL logoToledo
1-1 ยท 58.1 PWR
92%

MSU win probability

Projected line: MSU -7.7

MSU logoMichigan State
2-0 ยท 70.5 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

45QB vs QB51

-2.5 MSU advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Toledo (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). MSU FBS average.

55WR Room vs WR Room51

+1.7 TOL advantage โ€” 4-point index gap over Michigan State (explosive pass rate and yards per target). TOL FBS average.

40RB Room vs RB Room48

-3.4 MSU advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over Toledo (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). MSU FBS average.

33Run Blocking vs Run Defense58

-10.5 MSU advantage โ€” 25-point index gap over Toledo (line yards against stuff rate). MSU Above average.

39Offensive Line vs Pass Rush55

-6.7 MSU advantage โ€” 16-point index gap over Toledo (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). MSU FBS average.

52Pass Game vs Coverage50

+0.8 TOL advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Michigan State (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). TOL FBS average.

43Pass Rush vs Offensive Line50

-2.9 MSU advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Toledo (pressure differential in the trenches). MSU FBS average.

43Coverage vs Pass Game51

-3.4 MSU advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over Toledo (coverage grade against target efficiency). MSU FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.