CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
TTU logo
Home team (Team B)
ORST logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Texas Tech is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

TTU logoTexas Tech
2-0 ยท 80.5 PWR
96%

TTU win probability

Projected line: TTU -10.3

ORST logoOregon State
0-2 ยท 63.9 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

59QB vs QB48

+4.6 TTU advantage โ€” 11-point index gap over Oregon State (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). TTU Above average.

56WR Room vs WR Room49

+2.9 TTU advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Oregon State (explosive pass rate and yards per target). TTU FBS average.

58RB Room vs RB Room43

+6.3 TTU advantage โ€” 15-point index gap over Oregon State (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). TTU Above average.

60Run Blocking vs Run Defense45

+6.3 TTU advantage โ€” 15-point index gap over Oregon State (line yards against stuff rate). TTU Above average.

61Offensive Line vs Pass Rush45

+6.7 TTU advantage โ€” 16-point index gap over Oregon State (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). TTU Above average.

56Pass Game vs Coverage44

+5.0 TTU advantage โ€” 12-point index gap over Oregon State (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). TTU FBS average.

60Pass Rush vs Offensive Line47

+5.5 TTU advantage โ€” 13-point index gap over Oregon State (pressure differential in the trenches). TTU Above average.

62Coverage vs Pass Game49

+5.5 TTU advantage โ€” 13-point index gap over Oregon State (coverage grade against target efficiency). TTU Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.