CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

College Football Matchup Simulator

Team Selection

Away team (Team A)
TEX official team mark
Home team (Team B)
LSU official team mark
Texas official team markTexas
7-2 · 89.5 PWR
68%

TEX win probability

Projected line: TEX -3.2

LSU official team markLSU
6-3 · 84.3 PWR

Positional Comparison — 0 to 100 unit index

50 = FBS average · 72+ = Top 25 level · 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

78QB vs QB68

+4.2 TEX advantage — 10-point index gap over LSU (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). TEX Top 25 level.

80WR Room vs WR Room67

+5.5 TEX advantage — 13-point index gap over LSU (explosive pass rate and yards per target). TEX Top 25 level.

67RB Room vs RB Room71

-1.7 LSU advantage — 4-point index gap over Texas (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). LSU Above average.

63Run Blocking vs Run Defense81

-7.6 LSU advantage — 18-point index gap over Texas (line yards against stuff rate). LSU Top 25 level.

72Offensive Line vs Pass Rush77

-2.1 LSU advantage — 5-point index gap over Texas (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). LSU Top 25 level.

80Pass Game vs Coverage77

+1.3 TEX advantage — 3-point index gap over LSU (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). TEX Top 25 level.

70Pass Rush vs Offensive Line72

-0.8 LSU advantage — 2-point index gap over Texas (pressure differential in the trenches). LSU Top 25 level.

69Coverage vs Pass Game68

+0.4 TEX advantage — 1-point index gap over LSU (coverage grade against target efficiency). TEX Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.