CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
SYR logo
Home team (Team B)
PITT logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
SYR logoSyracuse
1-1 ยท 74.4 PWR
52%

SYR win probability

Projected line: SYR -0.4

PITT logoPittsburgh
2-0 ยท 73.7 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

58QB vs QB56

+0.8 SYR advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Pittsburgh (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). SYR Above average.

57WR Room vs WR Room58

-0.4 PITT advantage โ€” 1-point index gap over Syracuse (explosive pass rate and yards per target). PITT Above average.

63RB Room vs RB Room55

+3.4 SYR advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over Pittsburgh (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). SYR Above average.

65Run Blocking vs Run Defense55

+4.2 SYR advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over Pittsburgh (line yards against stuff rate). SYR Above average.

58Offensive Line vs Pass Rush49

+3.8 SYR advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Pittsburgh (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). SYR Above average.

57Pass Game vs Coverage50

+2.9 SYR advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Pittsburgh (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). SYR FBS average.

63Pass Rush vs Offensive Line56

+2.9 SYR advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Pittsburgh (pressure differential in the trenches). SYR Above average.

61Coverage vs Pass Game58

+1.3 SYR advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Pittsburgh (coverage grade against target efficiency). SYR Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.