CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
COLO logo
Home team (Team B)
ILL logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
COLO logoColorado
2-0 ยท 75.6 PWR
71%

COLO win probability

Projected line: COLO -3.9

ILL logoIllinois
1-1 ยท 69.3 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

50QB vs QB59

-3.8 ILL advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Colorado (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). ILL Above average.

50WR Room vs WR Room58

-3.4 ILL advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over Colorado (explosive pass rate and yards per target). ILL Above average.

53RB Room vs RB Room53

Even matchup โ€” both units index the same

54Run Blocking vs Run Defense45

+3.8 COLO advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Illinois (line yards against stuff rate). COLO FBS average.

55Offensive Line vs Pass Rush49

+2.5 COLO advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Illinois (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). COLO FBS average.

50Pass Game vs Coverage53

-1.3 ILL advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Colorado (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). ILL FBS average.

58Pass Rush vs Offensive Line56

+0.8 COLO advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Illinois (pressure differential in the trenches). COLO Above average.

52Coverage vs Pass Game59

-2.9 ILL advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Colorado (coverage grade against target efficiency). ILL Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.