CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
USA logo
Home team (Team B)
TULN logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” South Alabama is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

USA logoSouth Alabama
1-1 ยท 57.4 PWR
71%

TULN win probability

Projected line: TULN -3.9

TULN logoTulane
1-1 ยท 63.7 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

40QB vs QB45

-2.1 TULN advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over South Alabama (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). TULN FBS average.

40WR Room vs WR Room44

-1.7 TULN advantage โ€” 4-point index gap over South Alabama (explosive pass rate and yards per target). TULN FBS average.

43RB Room vs RB Room43

Even matchup โ€” both units index the same

44Run Blocking vs Run Defense48

-1.7 TULN advantage โ€” 4-point index gap over South Alabama (line yards against stuff rate). TULN FBS average.

44Offensive Line vs Pass Rush46

-0.8 TULN advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over South Alabama (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). TULN FBS average.

40Pass Game vs Coverage53

-5.5 TULN advantage โ€” 13-point index gap over South Alabama (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). TULN FBS average.

44Pass Rush vs Offensive Line46

-0.8 TULN advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over South Alabama (pressure differential in the trenches). TULN FBS average.

42Coverage vs Pass Game45

-1.3 TULN advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over South Alabama (coverage grade against target efficiency). TULN FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.