CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
SMU logo
Home team (Team B)
LOU logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” SMU is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

SMU logoSMU
2-0 ยท 78.6 PWR
61%

SMU win probability

Projected line: SMU -1.9

LOU logoLouisville
1-1 ยท 75.5 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

62QB vs QB57

+2.1 SMU advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Louisville (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). SMU Above average.

61WR Room vs WR Room59

+0.8 SMU advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Louisville (explosive pass rate and yards per target). SMU Above average.

57RB Room vs RB Room55

+0.8 SMU advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Louisville (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). SMU FBS average.

58Run Blocking vs Run Defense51

+2.9 SMU advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Louisville (line yards against stuff rate). SMU Above average.

61Offensive Line vs Pass Rush48

+5.5 SMU advantage โ€” 13-point index gap over Louisville (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). SMU Above average.

62Pass Game vs Coverage49

+5.5 SMU advantage โ€” 13-point index gap over Louisville (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). SMU Above average.

57Pass Rush vs Offensive Line51

+2.5 SMU advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Louisville (pressure differential in the trenches). SMU FBS average.

56Coverage vs Pass Game59

-1.3 LOU advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over SMU (coverage grade against target efficiency). LOU Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.