CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
SMU logo
Home team (Team B)
FSU logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
SMU logoSMU
2-0 ยท 78.6 PWR
61%

SMU win probability

Projected line: SMU -2.0

FSU logoFlorida State
1-1 ยท 75.4 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

62QB vs QB59

+1.3 SMU advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Florida State (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). SMU Above average.

61WR Room vs WR Room60

+0.4 SMU advantage โ€” 1-point index gap over Florida State (explosive pass rate and yards per target). SMU Above average.

57RB Room vs RB Room62

-2.1 FSU advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over SMU (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). FSU Above average.

58Run Blocking vs Run Defense58

Even matchup โ€” both units index the same

61Offensive Line vs Pass Rush57

+1.7 SMU advantage โ€” 4-point index gap over Florida State (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). SMU Above average.

62Pass Game vs Coverage56

+2.5 SMU advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Florida State (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). SMU Above average.

57Pass Rush vs Offensive Line60

-1.3 FSU advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over SMU (pressure differential in the trenches). FSU Above average.

56Coverage vs Pass Game60

-1.7 FSU advantage โ€” 4-point index gap over SMU (coverage grade against target efficiency). FSU Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.