CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
SJSU logo
Home team (Team B)
USC logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
SJSU logoSan José State
2-1 · 56.1 PWR
96%

USC win probability

Projected line: USC -15.9

USC logoUSC
3-0 · 81.7 PWR

Positional unit index — 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average · 72+ = Top 25 level · 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

41QB vs QB73

-13.4 USC advantage — 32-point index gap over San José State (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). USC Top 25 level.

44WR Room vs WR Room69

-10.5 USC advantage — 25-point index gap over San José State (explosive pass rate and yards per target). USC Above average.

39RB Room vs RB Room62

-9.7 USC advantage — 23-point index gap over San José State (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). USC Above average.

39Run Blocking vs Run Defense69

-12.6 USC advantage — 30-point index gap over San José State (line yards against stuff rate). USC Above average.

43Offensive Line vs Pass Rush65

-9.2 USC advantage — 22-point index gap over San José State (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). USC Above average.

43Pass Game vs Coverage62

-8.0 USC advantage — 19-point index gap over San José State (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). USC Above average.

38Pass Rush vs Offensive Line68

-12.6 USC advantage — 30-point index gap over San José State (pressure differential in the trenches). USC Above average.

41Coverage vs Pass Game70

-12.2 USC advantage — 29-point index gap over San José State (coverage grade against target efficiency). USC Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.