CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
SAC logo
Home team (Team B)
FRES logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
SAC logoSacramento State
1-2 ยท 47.4 PWR
74%

FRES win probability

Projected line: FRES -4.3

FRES logoFresno State
1-1 ยท 54.4 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

39QB vs QB43

-1.7 FRES advantage โ€” 4-point index gap over Sacramento State (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). FRES FBS average.

40WR Room vs WR Room45

-2.1 FRES advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Sacramento State (explosive pass rate and yards per target). FRES FBS average.

40RB Room vs RB Room35

+2.1 SAC advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Fresno State (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). SAC Below average.

36Run Blocking vs Run Defense50

-5.9 FRES advantage โ€” 14-point index gap over Sacramento State (line yards against stuff rate). FRES FBS average.

42Offensive Line vs Pass Rush36

+2.5 SAC advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Fresno State (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). SAC FBS average.

40Pass Game vs Coverage29

+4.6 SAC advantage โ€” 11-point index gap over Fresno State (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). SAC Below average.

46Pass Rush vs Offensive Line28

+7.6 SAC advantage โ€” 18-point index gap over Fresno State (pressure differential in the trenches). SAC FBS average.

46Coverage vs Pass Game45

+0.4 SAC advantage โ€” 1-point index gap over Fresno State (coverage grade against target efficiency). SAC FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.