CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
RICE logo
Home team (Team B)
ND logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Rice is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

RICE logoRice
1-1 ยท 52.0 PWR
96%

ND win probability

Projected line: ND -22.4

ND logoNotre Dame
2-0 ยท 88.1 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

40QB vs QB69

-12.2 ND advantage โ€” 29-point index gap over Rice (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). ND Above average.

37WR Room vs WR Room67

-12.6 ND advantage โ€” 30-point index gap over Rice (explosive pass rate and yards per target). ND Above average.

49RB Room vs RB Room67

-7.6 ND advantage โ€” 18-point index gap over Rice (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). ND Above average.

49Run Blocking vs Run Defense70

-8.8 ND advantage โ€” 21-point index gap over Rice (line yards against stuff rate). ND Above average.

48Offensive Line vs Pass Rush68

-8.4 ND advantage โ€” 20-point index gap over Rice (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). ND Above average.

37Pass Game vs Coverage68

-13.0 ND advantage โ€” 31-point index gap over Rice (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). ND Above average.

49Pass Rush vs Offensive Line68

-8.0 ND advantage โ€” 19-point index gap over Rice (pressure differential in the trenches). ND Above average.

51Coverage vs Pass Game68

-7.1 ND advantage โ€” 17-point index gap over Rice (coverage grade against target efficiency). ND Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.