CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
PSU logo
Home team (Team B)
TEM logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
PSU logoPenn State
2-0 ยท 82.0 PWR
96%

PSU win probability

Projected line: PSU -13.7

TEM logoTemple
1-1 ยท 59.9 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

75QB vs QB45

+12.6 PSU advantage โ€” 30-point index gap over Temple (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). PSU Top 25 level.

75WR Room vs WR Room44

+13.0 PSU advantage โ€” 31-point index gap over Temple (explosive pass rate and yards per target). PSU Top 25 level.

59RB Room vs RB Room46

+5.5 PSU advantage โ€” 13-point index gap over Temple (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). PSU Above average.

63Run Blocking vs Run Defense46

+7.1 PSU advantage โ€” 17-point index gap over Temple (line yards against stuff rate). PSU Above average.

67Offensive Line vs Pass Rush46

+8.8 PSU advantage โ€” 21-point index gap over Temple (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). PSU Above average.

75Pass Game vs Coverage49

+10.9 PSU advantage โ€” 26-point index gap over Temple (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). PSU Top 25 level.

63Pass Rush vs Offensive Line37

+10.9 PSU advantage โ€” 26-point index gap over Temple (pressure differential in the trenches). PSU Above average.

66Coverage vs Pass Game44

+9.2 PSU advantage โ€” 22-point index gap over Temple (coverage grade against target efficiency). PSU Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.