CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
OHIO logo
Home team (Team B)
USA logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Ohio is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

OHIO logoOhio
1-1 ยท 50.5 PWR
73%

USA win probability

Projected line: USA -4.3

USA logoSouth Alabama
1-1 ยท 57.4 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

33QB vs QB40

-2.9 USA advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Ohio (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). USA Below average.

35WR Room vs WR Room40

-2.1 USA advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Ohio (explosive pass rate and yards per target). USA Below average.

40RB Room vs RB Room43

-1.3 USA advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Ohio (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). USA FBS average.

42Run Blocking vs Run Defense51

-3.8 USA advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Ohio (line yards against stuff rate). USA FBS average.

38Offensive Line vs Pass Rush44

-2.5 USA advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Ohio (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). USA FBS average.

34Pass Game vs Coverage42

-3.4 USA advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over Ohio (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). USA FBS average.

37Pass Rush vs Offensive Line44

-2.9 USA advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Ohio (pressure differential in the trenches). USA FBS average.

36Coverage vs Pass Game40

-1.7 USA advantage โ€” 4-point index gap over Ohio (coverage grade against target efficiency). USA Below average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.