CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
OHIO logo
Home team (Team B)
NEB logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
OHIO logoOhio
1-1 ยท 50.5 PWR
96%

NEB win probability

Projected line: NEB -17.2

NEB logoNebraska
2-0 ยท 78.3 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

33QB vs QB61

-11.8 NEB advantage โ€” 28-point index gap over Ohio (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). NEB Above average.

35WR Room vs WR Room62

-11.3 NEB advantage โ€” 27-point index gap over Ohio (explosive pass rate and yards per target). NEB Above average.

40RB Room vs RB Room65

-10.5 NEB advantage โ€” 25-point index gap over Ohio (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). NEB Above average.

42Run Blocking vs Run Defense54

-5.0 NEB advantage โ€” 12-point index gap over Ohio (line yards against stuff rate). NEB FBS average.

38Offensive Line vs Pass Rush60

-9.2 NEB advantage โ€” 22-point index gap over Ohio (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). NEB Above average.

34Pass Game vs Coverage63

-12.2 NEB advantage โ€” 29-point index gap over Ohio (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). NEB Above average.

37Pass Rush vs Offensive Line60

-9.7 NEB advantage โ€” 23-point index gap over Ohio (pressure differential in the trenches). NEB Above average.

36Coverage vs Pass Game62

-10.9 NEB advantage โ€” 26-point index gap over Ohio (coverage grade against target efficiency). NEB Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.