CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
COLO logo
Home team (Team B)
NEB logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
COLO logoColorado
2-0 ยท 75.6 PWR
59%

NEB win probability

Projected line: NEB -1.7

NEB logoNebraska
2-0 ยท 78.3 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

50QB vs QB61

-4.6 NEB advantage โ€” 11-point index gap over Colorado (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). NEB Above average.

50WR Room vs WR Room62

-5.0 NEB advantage โ€” 12-point index gap over Colorado (explosive pass rate and yards per target). NEB Above average.

53RB Room vs RB Room65

-5.0 NEB advantage โ€” 12-point index gap over Colorado (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). NEB Above average.

54Run Blocking vs Run Defense54

Even matchup โ€” both units index the same

55Offensive Line vs Pass Rush60

-2.1 NEB advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Colorado (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). NEB Above average.

50Pass Game vs Coverage63

-5.5 NEB advantage โ€” 13-point index gap over Colorado (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). NEB Above average.

58Pass Rush vs Offensive Line60

-0.8 NEB advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Colorado (pressure differential in the trenches). NEB Above average.

52Coverage vs Pass Game62

-4.2 NEB advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over Colorado (coverage grade against target efficiency). NEB Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.