CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
UNM logo
Home team (Team B)
OU logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” New Mexico is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

UNM logoNew Mexico
2-0 ยท 54.3 PWR
96%

OU win probability

Projected line: OU -18.4

OU logoOklahoma
1-1 ยท 84.0 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

38QB vs QB74

-15.1 OU advantage โ€” 36-point index gap over New Mexico (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). OU Top 25 level.

34WR Room vs WR Room73

-16.4 OU advantage โ€” 39-point index gap over New Mexico (explosive pass rate and yards per target). OU Top 25 level.

43RB Room vs RB Room63

-8.4 OU advantage โ€” 20-point index gap over New Mexico (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). OU Above average.

45Run Blocking vs Run Defense67

-9.2 OU advantage โ€” 22-point index gap over New Mexico (line yards against stuff rate). OU Above average.

39Offensive Line vs Pass Rush74

-14.7 OU advantage โ€” 35-point index gap over New Mexico (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). OU Top 25 level.

35Pass Game vs Coverage69

-14.3 OU advantage โ€” 34-point index gap over New Mexico (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). OU Above average.

47Pass Rush vs Offensive Line66

-8.0 OU advantage โ€” 19-point index gap over New Mexico (pressure differential in the trenches). OU Above average.

48Coverage vs Pass Game74

-10.9 OU advantage โ€” 26-point index gap over New Mexico (coverage grade against target efficiency). OU Top 25 level.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.