CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
NCSU logo
Home team (Team B)
VAN logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
NCSU logoNC State
1-1 ยท 66.5 PWR
66%

VAN win probability

Projected line: VAN -2.9

VAN logoVanderbilt
2-0 ยท 71.2 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

48QB vs QB54

-2.5 VAN advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over NC State (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). VAN FBS average.

44WR Room vs WR Room52

-3.4 VAN advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over NC State (explosive pass rate and yards per target). VAN FBS average.

49RB Room vs RB Room55

-2.5 VAN advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over NC State (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). VAN FBS average.

54Run Blocking vs Run Defense50

+1.7 NCSU advantage โ€” 4-point index gap over Vanderbilt (line yards against stuff rate). NCSU FBS average.

53Offensive Line vs Pass Rush61

-3.4 VAN advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over NC State (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). VAN Above average.

45Pass Game vs Coverage56

-4.6 VAN advantage โ€” 11-point index gap over NC State (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). VAN FBS average.

51Pass Rush vs Offensive Line57

-2.5 VAN advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over NC State (pressure differential in the trenches). VAN FBS average.

42Coverage vs Pass Game52

-4.2 VAN advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over NC State (coverage grade against target efficiency). VAN FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.