CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
NAVY logo
Home team (Team B)
FAU logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Navy is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

NAVY logoNavy
1-1 ยท 32.3 PWR
96%

FAU win probability

Projected line: FAU -12.0

FAU logoFlorida Atlantic
1-1 ยท 51.7 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

11QB vs QB41

-12.6 FAU advantage โ€” 30-point index gap over Navy (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). FAU Below average.

8WR Room vs WR Room42

-14.3 FAU advantage โ€” 34-point index gap over Navy (explosive pass rate and yards per target). FAU FBS average.

26RB Room vs RB Room47

-8.8 FAU advantage โ€” 21-point index gap over Navy (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). FAU FBS average.

25Run Blocking vs Run Defense38

-5.5 FAU advantage โ€” 13-point index gap over Navy (line yards against stuff rate). FAU Below average.

21Offensive Line vs Pass Rush41

-8.4 FAU advantage โ€” 20-point index gap over Navy (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). FAU Below average.

7Pass Game vs Coverage37

-12.6 FAU advantage โ€” 30-point index gap over Navy (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). FAU Below average.

19Pass Rush vs Offensive Line47

-11.8 FAU advantage โ€” 28-point index gap over Navy (pressure differential in the trenches). FAU FBS average.

12Coverage vs Pass Game41

-12.2 FAU advantage โ€” 29-point index gap over Navy (coverage grade against target efficiency). FAU Below average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.