CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
COLO logo
Home team (Team B)
MTSU logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
COLO logoColorado
2-0 ยท 75.6 PWR
96%

COLO win probability

Projected line: COLO -12.3

MTSU logoMiddle Tennessee
1-1 ยท 55.8 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

50QB vs QB43

+2.9 COLO advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Middle Tennessee (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). COLO FBS average.

50WR Room vs WR Room42

+3.4 COLO advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over Middle Tennessee (explosive pass rate and yards per target). COLO FBS average.

53RB Room vs RB Room52

+0.4 COLO advantage โ€” 1-point index gap over Middle Tennessee (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). COLO FBS average.

54Run Blocking vs Run Defense40

+5.9 COLO advantage โ€” 14-point index gap over Middle Tennessee (line yards against stuff rate). COLO FBS average.

55Offensive Line vs Pass Rush37

+7.6 COLO advantage โ€” 18-point index gap over Middle Tennessee (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). COLO FBS average.

50Pass Game vs Coverage42

+3.4 COLO advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over Middle Tennessee (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). COLO FBS average.

58Pass Rush vs Offensive Line48

+4.2 COLO advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over Middle Tennessee (pressure differential in the trenches). COLO Above average.

52Coverage vs Pass Game42

+4.2 COLO advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over Middle Tennessee (coverage grade against target efficiency). COLO FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.