CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

College Football Matchup Simulator

Team Selection

Away team (Team A)
MIZ official team mark
Home team (Team B)
UGA official team mark
Missouri official team markMissouri
6-3 · 70.8 PWR
96%

UGA win probability

Projected line: UGA -13.9

Georgia official team markGeorgia
8-1 · 93.2 PWR

Positional Comparison — 0 to 100 unit index

50 = FBS average · 72+ = Top 25 level · 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

69QB vs QB79

-4.2 UGA advantage — 10-point index gap over Missouri (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). UGA Top 25 level.

66WR Room vs WR Room76

-4.2 UGA advantage — 10-point index gap over Missouri (explosive pass rate and yards per target). UGA Top 25 level.

59RB Room vs RB Room88

-12.2 UGA advantage — 29-point index gap over Missouri (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). UGA Top 25 level.

61Run Blocking vs Run Defense88

-11.3 UGA advantage — 27-point index gap over Missouri (line yards against stuff rate). UGA Top 25 level.

64Offensive Line vs Pass Rush74

-4.2 UGA advantage — 10-point index gap over Missouri (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). UGA Top 25 level.

67Pass Game vs Coverage75

-3.4 UGA advantage — 8-point index gap over Missouri (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). UGA Top 25 level.

60Pass Rush vs Offensive Line81

-8.8 UGA advantage — 21-point index gap over Missouri (pressure differential in the trenches). UGA Top 25 level.

67Coverage vs Pass Game77

-4.2 UGA advantage — 10-point index gap over Missouri (coverage grade against target efficiency). UGA Top 25 level.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.