CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
MSST logo
Home team (Team B)
SC logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Mississippi State is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

MSST logoMississippi State
2-0 ยท 80.8 PWR
50%

MSST win probability

Projected line: MSST -0.1

SC logoSouth Carolina
2-0 ยท 80.7 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

63QB vs QB70

-2.9 SC advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Mississippi State (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). SC Above average.

61WR Room vs WR Room67

-2.5 SC advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Mississippi State (explosive pass rate and yards per target). SC Above average.

71RB Room vs RB Room71

Even matchup โ€” both units index the same

68Run Blocking vs Run Defense63

+2.1 MSST advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over South Carolina (line yards against stuff rate). MSST Above average.

65Offensive Line vs Pass Rush60

+2.1 MSST advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over South Carolina (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). MSST Above average.

62Pass Game vs Coverage65

-1.3 SC advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Mississippi State (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). SC Above average.

58Pass Rush vs Offensive Line67

-3.8 SC advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Mississippi State (pressure differential in the trenches). SC Above average.

62Coverage vs Pass Game68

-2.5 SC advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Mississippi State (coverage grade against target efficiency). SC Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.