CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
MSST logo
Home team (Team B)
MINN logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Mississippi State is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

MSST logoMississippi State
2-0 ยท 80.8 PWR
88%

MSST win probability

Projected line: MSST -6.9

MINN logoMinnesota
1-1 ยท 69.7 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

63QB vs QB62

+0.4 MSST advantage โ€” 1-point index gap over Minnesota (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). MSST Above average.

61WR Room vs WR Room58

+1.3 MSST advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Minnesota (explosive pass rate and yards per target). MSST Above average.

71RB Room vs RB Room53

+7.6 MSST advantage โ€” 18-point index gap over Minnesota (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). MSST Above average.

68Run Blocking vs Run Defense57

+4.6 MSST advantage โ€” 11-point index gap over Minnesota (line yards against stuff rate). MSST Above average.

65Offensive Line vs Pass Rush55

+4.2 MSST advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over Minnesota (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). MSST Above average.

62Pass Game vs Coverage55

+2.9 MSST advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Minnesota (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). MSST Above average.

58Pass Rush vs Offensive Line57

+0.4 MSST advantage โ€” 1-point index gap over Minnesota (pressure differential in the trenches). MSST Above average.

62Coverage vs Pass Game59

+1.3 MSST advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Minnesota (coverage grade against target efficiency). MSST Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.