CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
MSU logo
Home team (Team B)
ND logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Michigan State is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

MSU logoMichigan State
2-0 ยท 70.5 PWR
96%

ND win probability

Projected line: ND -10.9

ND logoNotre Dame
2-0 ยท 88.1 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

51QB vs QB69

-7.6 ND advantage โ€” 18-point index gap over Michigan State (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). ND Above average.

51WR Room vs WR Room67

-6.7 ND advantage โ€” 16-point index gap over Michigan State (explosive pass rate and yards per target). ND Above average.

48RB Room vs RB Room67

-8.0 ND advantage โ€” 19-point index gap over Michigan State (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). ND Above average.

50Run Blocking vs Run Defense70

-8.4 ND advantage โ€” 20-point index gap over Michigan State (line yards against stuff rate). ND Above average.

50Offensive Line vs Pass Rush68

-7.6 ND advantage โ€” 18-point index gap over Michigan State (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). ND Above average.

51Pass Game vs Coverage68

-7.1 ND advantage โ€” 17-point index gap over Michigan State (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). ND Above average.

55Pass Rush vs Offensive Line68

-5.5 ND advantage โ€” 13-point index gap over Michigan State (pressure differential in the trenches). ND Above average.

50Coverage vs Pass Game68

-7.6 ND advantage โ€” 18-point index gap over Michigan State (coverage grade against target efficiency). ND Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.