CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
M-OH logo
Home team (Team B)
CIN logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
M-OH logoMiami (OH)
1-1 ยท 51.8 PWR
96%

CIN win probability

Projected line: CIN -9.7

CIN logoCincinnati
2-0 ยท 67.5 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

42QB vs QB45

-1.3 CIN advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Miami (OH) (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). CIN FBS average.

49WR Room vs WR Room46

+1.3 M-OH advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Cincinnati (explosive pass rate and yards per target). M-OH FBS average.

35RB Room vs RB Room52

-7.1 CIN advantage โ€” 17-point index gap over Miami (OH) (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). CIN FBS average.

38Run Blocking vs Run Defense47

-3.8 CIN advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Miami (OH) (line yards against stuff rate). CIN FBS average.

42Offensive Line vs Pass Rush53

-4.6 CIN advantage โ€” 11-point index gap over Miami (OH) (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). CIN FBS average.

47Pass Game vs Coverage52

-2.1 CIN advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Miami (OH) (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). CIN FBS average.

39Pass Rush vs Offensive Line49

-4.2 CIN advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over Miami (OH) (pressure differential in the trenches). CIN FBS average.

38Coverage vs Pass Game46

-3.4 CIN advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over Miami (OH) (coverage grade against target efficiency). CIN FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.