CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
MIA logo
Home team (Team B)
STAN logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
MIA logoMiami
2-0 ยท 84.8 PWR
96%

MIA win probability

Projected line: MIA -12.1

STAN logoStanford
1-1 ยท 65.3 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

75QB vs QB52

+9.7 MIA advantage โ€” 23-point index gap over Stanford (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). MIA Top 25 level.

73WR Room vs WR Room52

+8.8 MIA advantage โ€” 21-point index gap over Stanford (explosive pass rate and yards per target). MIA Top 25 level.

62RB Room vs RB Room53

+3.8 MIA advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Stanford (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). MIA Above average.

63Run Blocking vs Run Defense51

+5.0 MIA advantage โ€” 12-point index gap over Stanford (line yards against stuff rate). MIA Above average.

70Offensive Line vs Pass Rush49

+8.8 MIA advantage โ€” 21-point index gap over Stanford (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). MIA Above average.

74Pass Game vs Coverage50

+10.1 MIA advantage โ€” 24-point index gap over Stanford (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). MIA Top 25 level.

60Pass Rush vs Offensive Line55

+2.1 MIA advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Stanford (pressure differential in the trenches). MIA Above average.

64Coverage vs Pass Game52

+5.0 MIA advantage โ€” 12-point index gap over Stanford (coverage grade against target efficiency). MIA Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.