CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
COLO logo
Home team (Team B)
UNM logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
COLO logoColorado
2-0 ยท 75.6 PWR
96%

COLO win probability

Projected line: COLO -13.2

UNM logoNew Mexico
2-0 ยท 54.3 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

50QB vs QB38

+5.0 COLO advantage โ€” 12-point index gap over New Mexico (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). COLO FBS average.

50WR Room vs WR Room34

+6.7 COLO advantage โ€” 16-point index gap over New Mexico (explosive pass rate and yards per target). COLO FBS average.

53RB Room vs RB Room43

+4.2 COLO advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over New Mexico (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). COLO FBS average.

54Run Blocking vs Run Defense33

+8.8 COLO advantage โ€” 21-point index gap over New Mexico (line yards against stuff rate). COLO FBS average.

55Offensive Line vs Pass Rush47

+3.4 COLO advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over New Mexico (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). COLO FBS average.

50Pass Game vs Coverage48

+0.8 COLO advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over New Mexico (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). COLO FBS average.

58Pass Rush vs Offensive Line39

+8.0 COLO advantage โ€” 19-point index gap over New Mexico (pressure differential in the trenches). COLO Above average.

52Coverage vs Pass Game35

+7.1 COLO advantage โ€” 17-point index gap over New Mexico (coverage grade against target efficiency). COLO FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.