CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
MRSH logo
Home team (Team B)
PSU logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
MRSH logoMarshall
1-1 ยท 51.7 PWR
96%

PSU win probability

Projected line: PSU -18.8

PSU logoPenn State
2-0 ยท 82.0 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

40QB vs QB75

-14.7 PSU advantage โ€” 35-point index gap over Marshall (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). PSU Top 25 level.

40WR Room vs WR Room75

-14.7 PSU advantage โ€” 35-point index gap over Marshall (explosive pass rate and yards per target). PSU Top 25 level.

33RB Room vs RB Room59

-10.9 PSU advantage โ€” 26-point index gap over Marshall (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). PSU Above average.

30Run Blocking vs Run Defense73

-18.1 PSU advantage โ€” 43-point index gap over Marshall (line yards against stuff rate). PSU Top 25 level.

39Offensive Line vs Pass Rush63

-10.1 PSU advantage โ€” 24-point index gap over Marshall (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). PSU Above average.

40Pass Game vs Coverage66

-10.9 PSU advantage โ€” 26-point index gap over Marshall (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). PSU Above average.

38Pass Rush vs Offensive Line67

-12.2 PSU advantage โ€” 29-point index gap over Marshall (pressure differential in the trenches). PSU Above average.

31Coverage vs Pass Game75

-18.5 PSU advantage โ€” 44-point index gap over Marshall (coverage grade against target efficiency). PSU Top 25 level.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.