CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
LSU logo
Home team (Team B)
MISS logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” LSU is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

LSU logoLSU
2-0 ยท 88.7 PWR
65%

LSU win probability

Projected line: LSU -2.8

MISS logoOle Miss
2-0 ยท 84.2 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

68QB vs QB64

+1.7 LSU advantage โ€” 4-point index gap over Ole Miss (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). LSU Above average.

67WR Room vs WR Room65

+0.8 LSU advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Ole Miss (explosive pass rate and yards per target). LSU Above average.

71RB Room vs RB Room61

+4.2 LSU advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over Ole Miss (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). LSU Above average.

74Run Blocking vs Run Defense60

+5.9 LSU advantage โ€” 14-point index gap over Ole Miss (line yards against stuff rate). LSU Top 25 level.

72Offensive Line vs Pass Rush62

+4.2 LSU advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over Ole Miss (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). LSU Top 25 level.

68Pass Game vs Coverage57

+4.6 LSU advantage โ€” 11-point index gap over Ole Miss (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). LSU Above average.

77Pass Rush vs Offensive Line66

+4.6 LSU advantage โ€” 11-point index gap over Ole Miss (pressure differential in the trenches). LSU Top 25 level.

77Coverage vs Pass Game65

+5.0 LSU advantage โ€” 12-point index gap over Ole Miss (coverage grade against target efficiency). LSU Top 25 level.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.