CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
LOU logo
Home team (Team B)
MISS logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
LOU logoLouisville
1-1 ยท 75.5 PWR
80%

MISS win probability

Projected line: MISS -5.4

MISS logoOle Miss
2-0 ยท 84.2 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

57QB vs QB64

-2.9 MISS advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Louisville (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). MISS Above average.

59WR Room vs WR Room65

-2.5 MISS advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Louisville (explosive pass rate and yards per target). MISS Above average.

55RB Room vs RB Room61

-2.5 MISS advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Louisville (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). MISS Above average.

51Run Blocking vs Run Defense60

-3.8 MISS advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Louisville (line yards against stuff rate). MISS Above average.

51Offensive Line vs Pass Rush62

-4.6 MISS advantage โ€” 11-point index gap over Louisville (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). MISS Above average.

59Pass Game vs Coverage57

+0.8 LOU advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Ole Miss (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). LOU Above average.

48Pass Rush vs Offensive Line66

-7.6 MISS advantage โ€” 18-point index gap over Louisville (pressure differential in the trenches). MISS Above average.

49Coverage vs Pass Game65

-6.7 MISS advantage โ€” 16-point index gap over Louisville (coverage grade against target efficiency). MISS Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.