CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
LT logo
Home team (Team B)
BAY logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Louisiana Tech is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

LT logoLouisiana Tech
1-1 ยท 54.7 PWR
96%

BAY win probability

Projected line: BAY -10.5

BAY logoBaylor
1-1 ยท 71.6 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

57QB vs QB52

+2.1 LT advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Baylor (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). LT FBS average.

59WR Room vs WR Room53

+2.5 LT advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Baylor (explosive pass rate and yards per target). LT Above average.

51RB Room vs RB Room46

+2.1 LT advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Baylor (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). LT FBS average.

50Run Blocking vs Run Defense55

-2.1 BAY advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Louisiana Tech (line yards against stuff rate). BAY FBS average.

51Offensive Line vs Pass Rush59

-3.4 BAY advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over Louisiana Tech (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). BAY Above average.

59Pass Game vs Coverage56

+1.3 LT advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Baylor (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). LT Above average.

44Pass Rush vs Offensive Line54

-4.2 BAY advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over Louisiana Tech (pressure differential in the trenches). BAY FBS average.

45Coverage vs Pass Game52

-2.9 BAY advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Louisiana Tech (coverage grade against target efficiency). BAY FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.