CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
LIB logo
Home team (Team B)
JMU logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Liberty is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

LIB logoLiberty
1-1 ยท 58.3 PWR
57%

LIB win probability

Projected line: LIB -1.4

JMU logoJames Madison
2-0 ยท 56.1 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

45QB vs QB40

+2.1 LIB advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over James Madison (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). LIB FBS average.

46WR Room vs WR Room41

+2.1 LIB advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over James Madison (explosive pass rate and yards per target). LIB FBS average.

41RB Room vs RB Room43

-0.8 JMU advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Liberty (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). JMU FBS average.

43Run Blocking vs Run Defense42

+0.4 LIB advantage โ€” 1-point index gap over James Madison (line yards against stuff rate). LIB FBS average.

46Offensive Line vs Pass Rush38

+3.4 LIB advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over James Madison (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). LIB FBS average.

46Pass Game vs Coverage39

+2.9 LIB advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over James Madison (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). LIB FBS average.

42Pass Rush vs Offensive Line45

-1.3 JMU advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Liberty (pressure differential in the trenches). JMU FBS average.

45Coverage vs Pass Game41

+1.7 LIB advantage โ€” 4-point index gap over James Madison (coverage grade against target efficiency). LIB FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.