CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
KENT logo
Home team (Team B)
SC logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
KENT logoKent State
1-1 ยท 44.3 PWR
96%

SC win probability

Projected line: SC -22.6

SC logoSouth Carolina
2-0 ยท 80.7 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

32QB vs QB70

-16.0 SC advantage โ€” 38-point index gap over Kent State (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). SC Above average.

35WR Room vs WR Room67

-13.4 SC advantage โ€” 32-point index gap over Kent State (explosive pass rate and yards per target). SC Above average.

35RB Room vs RB Room71

-15.1 SC advantage โ€” 36-point index gap over Kent State (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). SC Above average.

35Run Blocking vs Run Defense63

-11.8 SC advantage โ€” 28-point index gap over Kent State (line yards against stuff rate). SC Above average.

37Offensive Line vs Pass Rush60

-9.7 SC advantage โ€” 23-point index gap over Kent State (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). SC Above average.

33Pass Game vs Coverage65

-13.4 SC advantage โ€” 32-point index gap over Kent State (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). SC Above average.

32Pass Rush vs Offensive Line67

-14.7 SC advantage โ€” 35-point index gap over Kent State (pressure differential in the trenches). SC Above average.

29Coverage vs Pass Game68

-16.4 SC advantage โ€” 39-point index gap over Kent State (coverage grade against target efficiency). SC Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.