CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
COLO logo
Home team (Team B)
PUR logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Colorado is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

COLO logoColorado
2-0 ยท 75.6 PWR
63%

COLO win probability

Projected line: COLO -2.4

PUR logoPurdue
1-1 ยท 71.7 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

50QB vs QB59

-3.8 PUR advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Colorado (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). PUR Above average.

50WR Room vs WR Room59

-3.8 PUR advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Colorado (explosive pass rate and yards per target). PUR Above average.

53RB Room vs RB Room53

Even matchup โ€” both units index the same

54Run Blocking vs Run Defense56

-0.8 PUR advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Colorado (line yards against stuff rate). PUR FBS average.

55Offensive Line vs Pass Rush60

-2.1 PUR advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Colorado (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). PUR Above average.

50Pass Game vs Coverage55

-2.1 PUR advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Colorado (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). PUR FBS average.

58Pass Rush vs Offensive Line56

+0.8 COLO advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Purdue (pressure differential in the trenches). COLO Above average.

52Coverage vs Pass Game59

-2.9 PUR advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Colorado (coverage grade against target efficiency). PUR Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.