CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
HOU logo
Home team (Team B)
TTU logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Houston is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

HOU logoHouston
2-0 ยท 76.1 PWR
65%

TTU win probability

Projected line: TTU -2.7

TTU logoTexas Tech
2-0 ยท 80.5 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

53QB vs QB59

-2.5 TTU advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Houston (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). TTU Above average.

53WR Room vs WR Room56

-1.3 TTU advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Houston (explosive pass rate and yards per target). TTU FBS average.

52RB Room vs RB Room58

-2.5 TTU advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Houston (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). TTU Above average.

52Run Blocking vs Run Defense57

-2.1 TTU advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Houston (line yards against stuff rate). TTU FBS average.

53Offensive Line vs Pass Rush60

-2.9 TTU advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Houston (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). TTU Above average.

53Pass Game vs Coverage62

-3.8 TTU advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Houston (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). TTU Above average.

52Pass Rush vs Offensive Line61

-3.8 TTU advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Houston (pressure differential in the trenches). TTU Above average.

50Coverage vs Pass Game56

-2.5 TTU advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Houston (coverage grade against target efficiency). TTU FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.